Öz
Aim: We planned this study to determine the compatibility of the polypectomy materials of the gastrointestinal system diagnosed in our department with the literature and if different characteristics.
Material and Method: 325 polypectomy materials diagnosed in 2017 were evaluated according to localization, diameter, age and histopathological types.
Findings: The age distribution of the patients ranged from 5 to 88 years, with an average age of 62.3 years and an average diameter of 5.8 mm. When we looked at the location of the polyps, 72.6% cases were located in the colon, 24% in the stomach and 0.3% in the small intestine and anastomotic region. It was found that most of the colon polyps were in sigmoid (33.0%) and most of the stomach polyps were in antrum (26.9%). The largest group of patients (49.8%) had hyperplastic polyps in terms of histopathological types in gastrointestinal system polyps, and tubuler adenomas were the second most common in 25.5% of cases.
Results: Our results in our analysis of gastrointestinal system polyps are similar to the literature findings.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Gastrointestinal polyps histopathological type localization size age
Kaynakça
- Referanslar1. Lau CF, Hui PK, Mak KL et al. Gastric polypoid lesions illustrative cases and literature review. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 2559-64 2- Rafiul Sameer Islam, Neal C. Patel, Dora Lam-Himlin, Cuong C. Nguyen. Gastric Polyps: A Review of Clinical, Endoscopic, and Histopathologic Features and Management Decisions. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013; 9(10): 640–51. 3- Do Youn Park and Gregory Y. Lauwers. Gastric Polyps: Classification and Management. Arch Path Lab Med 2008;132(4):633-640. 4- Atalay R, Solakoğlu T, Sarı SÖ et al. Evaluation of gastric polyps detected by endoscopy: A single-center study of a four-year experience in Turkey. Tr J Gastroenterol 2014; 25: 370-35. Silverstein FE, Tytgat GNJ. Stomach II: Tumors and polyps, In: Silverstein FE, Tytgat GNJ, Editors. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 3rd ed. London. Mosby 1997; 147-80.6. Jain R, Chetty R. Gastric hyperplastik polyps: a review. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 1839-46.7. Davaris P, Petraki K, Archimandritis A, et al. Mucosal hyperplastik polyps of the stomach. Do they have any potential to malignancy? Pathol Res Pract 1986; 181: 385-9.8. Hizawa K, Fuchigami T, lida M, et al. Possible neoplastic transformation within gastric hyperplastic polyp. Application of endoscopic polypectomy. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 714-8.9. Zea-Iriarte WL, Sekine I, Itsuno M, et al. Carcinoma in gastric hyperplastic polyps: a phenotypic study. Dig Dis Sci 1996; 41: 377-86.10. Morais DJ, Yamanaka A, Zeiture JM, Andreollo NA. Gastric polyps: a retrospectiveanalysis of 26.000 digestive endoscopies. Arq Gastroenterol 2007; 44: 14-7.11. Archimandritis A, Spiliadis C, Tzivras M, et al. Gastric epithelial polyps: aretrospective endoscopic study of 12974 symptomatic patients. Ital J Gatroenterol 1996; 28: 387-90.12. Owen DA. The stomach, In: Sternberg SS, Editor. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1999; 1311-47.13. Debongnie JC. Gastric polyps. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1999; 62: 187-9.14. Nakamura T, Nakano G. Histopathological classification and malignant change in gastric polyps. J Clin Pathol 1985; 38: 754-64.15. DiSario JA, Fautch PG, Mai HD, et al. Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymtomatic, avarage-risk men. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 941-5.16. Lieberman DA, Smith FW. Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 946-51.17. Altınparmak E, Sezgin O, Parlak E, Altıntaş E. Colorectal polyps ‘The Yüksek İhtisas experience’. Turk J Gastroenterol 2001; 12: 49-52.18. O’Brien MJ, Winaver SJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study: Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterolgy 1990; 98: 371-9.19. Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975: 36; 2251-70.20- Eminler AT, Sakallı M, Irak K et al. Gastroenteroloji ünitemizdeki kolonoskopik polipektomi sonuçlarımız. Akademik Gastroenterol Derg 2011; 10(3): 112-5. 21- Dölek Y, Karabulut YY, Topal F, Kurşun N. Evaluation of gastrointestinal polyps according to their size, localization and histopathologic types. Endoskopi Derg 2013; 21 (2) : 31-5 22. Granqvist S, Cabrielsson N, Sundelin P. Diminutive colonic polypsclinical significance and managemant. Endoscopy 1979; 11: 36-42.23. Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Demling L. Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 1985; 17: 175-81.24-Sangeetha N Kalimuthu, Adeline Chelliah, Runjan Chetty. From traditional serrated adenoma to tubulovillous adenoma and beyond. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016; 8(12): 805–09.25- O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG et al. The National Polyp Study: Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterol 1990; 98: 371-9. 26-Sangeetha N, Kalimuthu, Adeline Chelliah, Runjan Chetty. From traditional serrated adenoma to tubulovillous adenoma and beyond. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016; 8(12): 805–09.
Öz
Amaç: Anabilim
dalımızda tanı alan gastrointestinal sisteme ait polipektomi materyallerinde
izlenen bulguların literatür ile uyumu ve varsa farklı özelliklerin tespiti
için bu çalışmayı planladık.
Gereç
ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda 2017 yılı içinde anabilim dalımızda tanısı
konulan gastrointestinal sisteme ait 325 adet polipektomi materyali
lokalizasyon, çap, yaş ve histopatolojik tiplerine göre incelendi.
Bulgular: Hastaların
yaş dağılımı 5-88 arasında değişmekte olup, yaş ortalaması 62,3 yıl, ortalama
çap 5,8 mm olarak saptandı. Poliplerin yerleşim yeri açısından bakıldığında %72,6’ü
kolon, %24’ü mide, %0,3’ü ise ince barsak ve anastomoz bölgesi yerleşimliydi.
Kolon poliplerinin büyük kısmının sigmoidde (%33,0), mide yerleşimli poliplerin
ise büyük kısmının antrumda (%26,9) oldukları saptandı. Gastrointestinal sistem
poliplerinde histopatolojik tipler bakımından en büyük hasta grubunu (%49,8)
hiperplastik polip oluştururken; %25,5
olgu ile tübüler adenom ikinci sırada yer almaktaydı.
Sonuç:
Gastrointestinal sistem poliplerini analiz ettiğimiz çalışmamızda sonuçlarımız
literatür bulguları ile benzerlik göstermektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Gastrointestinal polipler histopatolojik tip lokalizasyon boyut yaş
Kaynakça
- Referanslar1. Lau CF, Hui PK, Mak KL et al. Gastric polypoid lesions illustrative cases and literature review. Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 2559-64 2- Rafiul Sameer Islam, Neal C. Patel, Dora Lam-Himlin, Cuong C. Nguyen. Gastric Polyps: A Review of Clinical, Endoscopic, and Histopathologic Features and Management Decisions. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2013; 9(10): 640–51. 3- Do Youn Park and Gregory Y. Lauwers. Gastric Polyps: Classification and Management. Arch Path Lab Med 2008;132(4):633-640. 4- Atalay R, Solakoğlu T, Sarı SÖ et al. Evaluation of gastric polyps detected by endoscopy: A single-center study of a four-year experience in Turkey. Tr J Gastroenterol 2014; 25: 370-35. Silverstein FE, Tytgat GNJ. Stomach II: Tumors and polyps, In: Silverstein FE, Tytgat GNJ, Editors. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 3rd ed. London. Mosby 1997; 147-80.6. Jain R, Chetty R. Gastric hyperplastik polyps: a review. Dig Dis Sci 2009; 54: 1839-46.7. Davaris P, Petraki K, Archimandritis A, et al. Mucosal hyperplastik polyps of the stomach. Do they have any potential to malignancy? Pathol Res Pract 1986; 181: 385-9.8. Hizawa K, Fuchigami T, lida M, et al. Possible neoplastic transformation within gastric hyperplastic polyp. Application of endoscopic polypectomy. Surg Endosc 1995; 9: 714-8.9. Zea-Iriarte WL, Sekine I, Itsuno M, et al. Carcinoma in gastric hyperplastic polyps: a phenotypic study. Dig Dis Sci 1996; 41: 377-86.10. Morais DJ, Yamanaka A, Zeiture JM, Andreollo NA. Gastric polyps: a retrospectiveanalysis of 26.000 digestive endoscopies. Arq Gastroenterol 2007; 44: 14-7.11. Archimandritis A, Spiliadis C, Tzivras M, et al. Gastric epithelial polyps: aretrospective endoscopic study of 12974 symptomatic patients. Ital J Gatroenterol 1996; 28: 387-90.12. Owen DA. The stomach, In: Sternberg SS, Editor. Diagnostic Surgical Pathology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 1999; 1311-47.13. Debongnie JC. Gastric polyps. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1999; 62: 187-9.14. Nakamura T, Nakano G. Histopathological classification and malignant change in gastric polyps. J Clin Pathol 1985; 38: 754-64.15. DiSario JA, Fautch PG, Mai HD, et al. Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymtomatic, avarage-risk men. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 941-5.16. Lieberman DA, Smith FW. Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1991; 86: 946-51.17. Altınparmak E, Sezgin O, Parlak E, Altıntaş E. Colorectal polyps ‘The Yüksek İhtisas experience’. Turk J Gastroenterol 2001; 12: 49-52.18. O’Brien MJ, Winaver SJ, Zauber AG, et al. The National Polyp Study: Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterolgy 1990; 98: 371-9.19. Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975: 36; 2251-70.20- Eminler AT, Sakallı M, Irak K et al. Gastroenteroloji ünitemizdeki kolonoskopik polipektomi sonuçlarımız. Akademik Gastroenterol Derg 2011; 10(3): 112-5. 21- Dölek Y, Karabulut YY, Topal F, Kurşun N. Evaluation of gastrointestinal polyps according to their size, localization and histopathologic types. Endoskopi Derg 2013; 21 (2) : 31-5 22. Granqvist S, Cabrielsson N, Sundelin P. Diminutive colonic polypsclinical significance and managemant. Endoscopy 1979; 11: 36-42.23. Matek W, Guggenmoos-Holzmann I, Demling L. Follow-up of patients with colorectal adenomas. Endoscopy 1985; 17: 175-81.24-Sangeetha N Kalimuthu, Adeline Chelliah, Runjan Chetty. From traditional serrated adenoma to tubulovillous adenoma and beyond. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016; 8(12): 805–09.25- O'Brien MJ, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG et al. The National Polyp Study: Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Gastroenterol 1990; 98: 371-9. 26-Sangeetha N, Kalimuthu, Adeline Chelliah, Runjan Chetty. From traditional serrated adenoma to tubulovillous adenoma and beyond. World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016; 8(12): 805–09.
Ayrıntılar
| Birincil Dil | Türkçe |
|---|---|
| Konular | Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi |
| Bölüm | Orijinal Makale |
| Yazarlar | |
| Yayımlanma Tarihi | 30 Haziran 2018 |
| Yayımlandığı Sayı | Yıl 2018 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2 |
Üniversitelerarası Kurul (ÜAK) Eşdeğerliği: Ulakbim TR Dizin'de olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [10 PUAN] ve 1a, b, c hariç uluslararası indekslerde (1d) olan dergilerde yayımlanan makale [5 PUAN]
Dahil olduğumuz İndeksler (Dizinler) ve Platformlar sayfanın en altındadır.
Not: Dergimiz WOS indeksli değildir ve bu nedenle Q olarak sınıflandırılmamıştır.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK) kriterlerine göre yağmacı/şüpheli dergiler hakkındaki kararları ile yazar aydınlatma metni ve dergi ücretlendirme politikasını tarayıcınızdan indirebilirsiniz. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show
Dergi Dizin ve Platformları
Dizinler; ULAKBİM TR Dizin, Index Copernicus, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, EuroPub, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, vs.
Platformlar; Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons vs.