TR
EN
Parameters affecting the anatomical and functional success of macular hole surgery
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the effect of preoperative Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) parameters on macular hole surgery (MHS) and their predictive value for postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA).
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 30 eyes of 30 patients with macular hole (MH). All patients underwent pars plana 23-gauge vitrectomy. A detailed macular analysis including MH minimum diameter (MD), base diameter (BD), opening diameter (OD), height, nasal arm (NA), temporal arm (TA), macular hole index (MHI), diameter hole index (DHI), tractional hole index (THI), hole form factor (HHF), macular hole area (MHA), and macular hole volume (MHV) were performed preoperatively. Presence of inner segment–outer segment (IS/OS) line, external limiting membrane (ELM), and cyst was noted postoperatively. Relationships between these parameters and postoperative BCVA were evaluated.
Results: The study group comprised 25 (83.3%) women. Mean pre and postoperative BCVA values were 0.924±0.320 and 0.487±0.287 logMAR, respectively. BCVA improved significantly after MHS (p<0.001). There was a statistically positive correlation between postop BCVA (logMAR) values, and NA (p=0.041), HFF (p=0.048), OD (p=0.045) and symptom duration before MHS (p=0.032). Postoperative BCVA was significantly better in patients with postoperative IS/OS line and ELM presence compared to those without (p=0.002 and p=0.002, respectively). The NA, postoperative IS/OS and ELM variables were found to be effective on postoperative BCVA (logMAR).
Conclusion: In this study, NA was determined as a predictive factor for the first time and together with NA, presence of IS/OS line and ELM were identified as predictive factors for visual prognosis after MHS.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
yok
References
- Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, et al. The international vitreomacular traction study group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology 2013; 120: 2611-9.
- Ullrich S, Haritoglou C, Gass C, et al. Macular hole size as a prognostic factor in macular hole surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2002; 86: 390-3.
- Oh J, Smiddy W, Flynn H, et al. Photoreceptor inner/outer segment defect imaging by spectral domain OCT and visual prognosis after macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010; 51: 1651-8.
- Ooka E, Mitamura Y, Baba T, et al. Foveal Microstructure on Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomographic Images and Visual Function After Macular Hole Surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 152 (2) :283-90.
- Wilczyński T, Heinke A, Niedzielska-Krycia A, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography features in patients with idiopathic full-thickness macular hole, before and after surgical treatment. Clinical Interventions in Aging 2019; 14: 505-14.
- Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Nawrocki J. Continuous changes in macular morphology after macular hole closure visualized with spectral optical coherence tomography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010; 248: 1249-55.
- Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, et al. Restoration of the photoreceptor outer segment and visual outcomes after macular hole closure: spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011; 249: 1469-76.
- Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, et al. Correlation between length of foveal cone outer segment tips line defect and visual acuity after macular hole closure. Ophthalmology 2012; 119: 1438-46.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Health Care Administration
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
September 12, 2022
Submission Date
June 9, 2022
Acceptance Date
July 16, 2022
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 61 Number: 3
APA
Kırıkkaya, E., & Kaynak, S. (2022). Parameters affecting the anatomical and functional success of macular hole surgery. Ege Tıp Dergisi, 61(3), 434-443. https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1168207
AMA
1.Kırıkkaya E, Kaynak S. Parameters affecting the anatomical and functional success of macular hole surgery. EJM. 2022;61(3):434-443. doi:10.19161/etd.1168207
Chicago
Kırıkkaya, Esin, and Süleyman Kaynak. 2022. “Parameters Affecting the Anatomical and Functional Success of Macular Hole Surgery”. Ege Tıp Dergisi 61 (3): 434-43. https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1168207.
EndNote
Kırıkkaya E, Kaynak S (September 1, 2022) Parameters affecting the anatomical and functional success of macular hole surgery. Ege Tıp Dergisi 61 3 434–443.
IEEE
[1]E. Kırıkkaya and S. Kaynak, “Parameters affecting the anatomical and functional success of macular hole surgery”, EJM, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 434–443, Sept. 2022, doi: 10.19161/etd.1168207.
ISNAD
Kırıkkaya, Esin - Kaynak, Süleyman. “Parameters Affecting the Anatomical and Functional Success of Macular Hole Surgery”. Ege Tıp Dergisi 61/3 (September 1, 2022): 434-443. https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1168207.
JAMA
1.Kırıkkaya E, Kaynak S. Parameters affecting the anatomical and functional success of macular hole surgery. EJM. 2022;61:434–443.
MLA
Kırıkkaya, Esin, and Süleyman Kaynak. “Parameters Affecting the Anatomical and Functional Success of Macular Hole Surgery”. Ege Tıp Dergisi, vol. 61, no. 3, Sept. 2022, pp. 434-43, doi:10.19161/etd.1168207.
Vancouver
1.Esin Kırıkkaya, Süleyman Kaynak. Parameters affecting the anatomical and functional success of macular hole surgery. EJM. 2022 Sep. 1;61(3):434-43. doi:10.19161/etd.1168207