Research Article

Hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio as a practical prognostic tool in second-line immunotherapy for non–small cell lung cancer

Volume: 65 Number: 1 March 9, 2026
TR EN

Hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio as a practical prognostic tool in second-line immunotherapy for non–small cell lung cancer

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the prognostic value of baseline hemoglobin-to–red cell distribution width ratio (HRR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced or metastatic non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving second-line nivolumab. Materials and Methods: Patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC treated with second-line nivolumab were retrospectively analyzed. Baseline hemoglobin (g/dL) and RDW (%) were obtained prior to treatment initiation, and HRR (Hb/RDW) was calculated. Patients were categorized into low (<0.7) and high (≥0.7) HRR groups using a predefined cutoff. Survival outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and prognostic factors were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: A total of 114 patients were included. Median baseline hemoglobin, RDW, and HRR were 11.2 g/dL, 15.4%, and 0.74, respectively; 57.9% of patients had low HRR. Median PFS was 4.0 months, and patients with high HRR had significantly longer PFS than those with low HRR (6.5 vs 3.2 months; p=0.011). In multivariate analysis, ECOG performance status ≥2, ≥3 metastatic sites, and low HRR independently predicted shorter PFS (low HRR: HR=2.00; p=0.007). Median OS was 10.0 months, with significantly longer OS observed in the high HRR group (18.7 vs 6.0 months; p<0.001). Low HRR remained an independent adverse prognostic factor for OS (HR=2.87; p<0.001). Conclusion: Baseline HRR is a simple, inexpensive, and independent prognostic marker associated with inferior survival outcomes in advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients treated with second-line nivolumab.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

This study did not receive any specific funding from public, commercial, or non-profit organizations.

Ethical Statement

Ethical approval This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Ege University Faculty of Medicine (Decision No: 25-12T/4, Date: 04 December 2025). Due to the retrospective nature of the study, the requirement for informed consent was waived. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Thanks

Not applicable.

References

  1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2024;74(3):229-63.
  2. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2021;71(3):209-49.
  3. Schabath MB, Cote ML. Cancer progress and priorities: lung cancer. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention. 2019;28(10):1563-79.
  4. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P, Crinò L, Eberhardt WE, Poddubskaya E, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non–small-cell lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(2):123-35.
  5. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, Spigel DR, Steins M, Ready NE, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015;373(17):1627-39.
  6. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim D-W, Felip E, Pérez-Gracia JL, Han J-Y, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. The lancet. 2016;387(10027):1540-50.
  7. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D, Park K, Ciardiello F, Von Pawel J, et al. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2017;389(10066):255-65.
  8. Wang H, Niu X, Jin Z, Zhang S, Fan R, Xiao H, Hu SS. Immunotherapy resistance in non-small cell lung cancer: from mechanisms to therapeutic opportunities. Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research. 2025;44(1):250.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Oncology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 9, 2026

Submission Date

December 29, 2025

Acceptance Date

January 3, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 65 Number: 1

Vancouver
1.Gökhan Şahin, Caner Acar, Salih Tünbekici, Haydar Çağatay Yüksel, Fatma Pınar Açar, Pınar Gürsoy. Hemoglobin-to-red cell distribution width ratio as a practical prognostic tool in second-line immunotherapy for non–small cell lung cancer. EJM. 2026 Mar. 1;65(1):131-8. doi:10.19161/etd.1849122

Ege Journal of Medicine enables the sharing of articles according to the Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license.