Redirecting to http://dergipark.org.tr/_fragment?_hash=wKcDshiOc99HYlFf7e6scChreMPKdcsme10G-qcrEo0&_path=id%3D1161058%26_format%3Dhtml%26_locale%3Dtr%26_controller%3DApp%255CController%255CSite%255CArticleController%253A%253AesiArticleStats.
Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Egzersiz için Hedef İçeriği Anketi’nin Türkçe versiyonunun kültürler arası adaptasyonu, güvenilirliği ve geçerliliği

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 62 Sayı: 3, 376 - 384, 18.09.2023

Fatih Özden , Mehmet Özkeskin

https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1360390

Öz

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, Egzersiz için Hedef İçeriği Anketi'nin (EHİA) Türkçe versiyonunun kültürler arası adaptasyonunu, güvenilirliğini ve geçerliliğini ortaya koymaktır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: 100 sağlıklı genç bireyle prospektif ve kesitsel bir çalışma yapıldı. Katılımcılar EHİA ile değerlendirildi. Bir hafta sonra, 39 kişi EHİA'yı yeniden doldurdu. Güvenilirlik, sınıf içi korelasyon katsayısı (ICC) ve Cronbach’ın α katsayısı ile değerlendirildi. Yapı geçerliliği korelasyonel analiz ve açıklayıcı faktör analizi ile belirlendi. EHİA'nın kesme değeri, ROC eğrisi ile belirlendi. Öte yandan, EHİA'nın minimum saptanabilir değişiklik (MDC95) ve Standart ölçüm hatası (SEM95) değerleri hesaplanmıştır.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplam 100 birey (21,1±2,9 yıl, %72 kadın) dahil edildi. Toplam ve alt puanlar
için alfa katsayısı >0,80 idi (görüntü alt skoru hariç). Öte yandan, ICC analizinde tüm puanlar 0,80'in
üzerinde puanlandı. EHİA'nın SEM95 ve MDC95 değerleri sırasıyla 4,83 ve 13,3 idi. EHİA toplam
puanının diğer tüm alt skorlarla >0,50 korelasyon katsayısı vardı (r=0,55 ile 0,80; p<0,01). Öte yandan,
ayırıcı geçerliliği kapsamında alt puanların birbirleriyle korelasyonu 0.80'in altındaydı (r=0,15 ile 0,73).
Açıklayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre EHİA 4 faktörlü bir yapıya sahipti. GCEQ'nun cut-off değeri
109,4 olarak belirlendi.
Sonuç: EHİA'nın Türkçe versiyonu sağlıklı bireyler için geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçektir. Ayrıca,
EHİA'nın SEM95, MDC95 ve cut-off değerleri, klinisyenlere ve fizyoterapistlere bireylerin fiziksel aktivite
yönelimlerinin norm değerleri sağlamak için belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Egzersiz geçerlik güvenirlik hedef içeriği Türkçe versiyon Otonomi

Kaynakça

  • Smith BE, Hendrick P, Bateman M, Holden S, Littlewood C, Smith TO, et al. Musculoskeletal pain and exercise—challenging existing paradigms and introducing new. British journal of sports medicine. 2019;53(14):907-12.
  • Dodge T, Joshi D, Alharbi M, Moore B. Effect of physical activity goals on aerobic physical activity: testing the mediating role of external and internal motivation. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2022;27(6):1296-310.
  • Männikkö N, Billieux J, Kääriäinen M. Problematic digital gaming behavior and its relation to the psychological, social and physical health of Finnish adolescents and young adults. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2015;4(4):281-8.
  • Kosholap A, Maksymchuk B, Branitska T, Martynets L, Boichenko A, Stoliarenko O, et al. Neuropsychological bases of self-improvement of own physical health of future teachers in the course of university education. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2021;12(3):171-90.
  • Sebire SJ, Standage M, Vansteenkiste M. Development and validation of the goal content for exercise questionnaire. Journal of sport & exercise psychology. 2008;30(4).
  • Vasconcellos D, Parker PD, Hilland T, Cinelli R, Owen KB, Kapsal N, et al. Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of educational psychology. 2020;112(7):1444.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Rajagiri Management Journal. 2021;15(1):88-90.
  • Lindwall M, Weman-Josefsson K, Sebire SJ, Standage M. Viewing exercise goal content through a personoriented lens: A self-determination perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;27:85-92.
  • Gut V, Conzelmann A, Schmid J. What do adolescents and young adults strive for in sport and exercise? An explorative study on goal profiles in sport and exercise. Journal of sports sciences. 2022;40(5):571-82.
  • Abrams B, Heggeseth B, Rehkopf D, Davis E. Parity and body mass index in US women: a prospective 25‐ year study. Obesity. 2013;21(8):1514-8.
  • Duncan MJ, Eyre EL, Bryant E, Seghers J, Galbraith N, Nevill AM. Autonomous motivation mediates the relation between goals for physical activity and physical activity behavior in adolescents. Journal of health psychology. 2017;22(5):595-604.
  • Sibley BA, Bergman SM. Relationships among goal contents, exercise motivations, physical activity, and aerobic fitness in university physical education courses. Perceptual and motor skills. 2016;122(2):678-700.
  • Izquierdo M, Merchant RA, Morley JE, Anker SD, Aprahamian I, Arai H, et al. International exercise recommendations in older adults (ICFSR): expert consensus guidelines. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2021;25(7):824-53.
  • Nicolosi S, Ruiz RO, Sillero JD. Achievement goal orientations and perceived physical competence profiles in adolescent physical activity. Psychology, Society & Education. 2021;13(1):27-47.
  • Trost SG, Sallis JF, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Taylor WC, Dowda M. Evaluating a model of parental influence on youth physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine. 2003;25(4):277-82.
  • Sicilia A, Alcaraz-Ibanez M, Lirola M-J, Burgueno R. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Goal Content for Exercise Questionnaire. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. 2017;49(3):182-93.
  • Antunes R, Couto N, Monteiro D, Moutão J, Marinho DA, Cid L. Validation of the Goal Content for Exercise Questionnaire (GCEQ) for a sample of elderly Portuguese people. Motricidade. 2017;13(1):59-67.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
  • Özden F, Tuğay N, Tuğay BU, Kılınç CY. Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the new knee society scoring system. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica. 2019;53(3):184-8.
  • Koohpayehzadeh J, Hashemi A, Arabshahi KS, Bigdeli S, Moosavi M, Hatami K, et al. Assessing validity and reliability of Dundee ready educational environment measure (DREEM) in Iran. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2014;28:60.
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods. 2009;41(4):1149-60.
  • Walter S, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in medicine. 1998;17(1):101-10.
  • Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Statistics in medicine. 2002;21(9):1331-5.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2007;60(1):34- 42.
  • Baumgartner TA, Chung H. Confidence limits for intraclass reliability coefficients. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2001;5(3):179-88.
  • Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice (Vol. 892, pp. 11-15). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
  • Juniper EF. How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. Quality of life and pharamacoeconomics in clinical trials. 1996:49-56.
  • Ruiz FJ, Odriozola-González P, Suárez-Falcón JC, Segura-Vargas MA. Psychometric properties of the Valuing Questionnaire in a Spaniard sample and factorial equivalence with a Colombian sample. PeerJ. 2022;10:e12670.
  • Chai S, Kueh YC, Yaacob NM, Kuan G. Psychometric properties of the malay version of the goal content for exercise questionnaire among undergraduate students at the health campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS. 2019;26(1):115.
  • Brebante ZR, Cagas JY. Body image, body mass index and the experience of Hiya in physical education among Filipino female university students. Asia Life Sciences. 2015;24(2):647-59.
  • Kumar R, Indrayan A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian pediatrics. 2011;48(4):277-87.
  • Lindwall M, Martin Ginis KA. Moving towards a favorable image: The self‐presentational benefits of exercise and physical activity. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2006;47(3):209-17.
  • Vilhjalmsson R, Thorlindsson T. Factors related to physical activity: a study of adolescents. Social science & medicine. 1998;47(5):665-75.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC medical research methodology. 2010;10(1):1-8.
  • Myers RS, Roth DL. Perceived benefits of and barriers to exercise and stage of exercise adoption in young adults. Health Psychology. 1997;16(3):277.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Goal Content for Exercise Questionnaire

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 62 Sayı: 3, 376 - 384, 18.09.2023

Fatih Özden , Mehmet Özkeskin

https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1360390

Öz

Aim: The aim of the study was to demonstrate the cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Goal Content for Exercise Questionnaire (GCEQ).
Materials and Methods: A prospective and cross-sectional study was carried out with 100 healthy young individuals. Participants were assessed with GCEQ. One week later, 39 individuals refilled the GCEQ. Reliability was evaluated with the Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's α coefficient. Construct validity was determined by correlational and explanatory factor analysis. The cut-off value of GCEQ was discriminated with the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. On the other hand, the minimum detectable change (MDC95) and Standard error of measurement (SEM95) values of the GCEQ were calculated.
Results: A total of 100 individuals (21.1±2.9 years, 72% female) were included in the study. The alpha coefficient was >0.80 for the total and sub scores (except for the image sub score). On the other hand, all scores were scored above 0.80 in ICC analysis. The SEM95 and MDC95 values of the GCEQ were 4.83 and 13.3, respectively. The GCEQ total score had a correlation coefficient of >0.50 with all other sub scores (r=0.55 to 0.80, p<0.01). On the other hand, the sub scores' correlation with each other was below 0.80 within the scope of discriminant validity (r=0.15 to 0.73). According to the exploratory factor analysis results, the GCEQ had a 4-factor structure. The cut-off value of the GCEQ was determined as 109.4.
Conclusion: The Turkish version of the GCEQ is a valid and reliable scale for healthy individuals. In addition, the SEM95, MDC95 and cut-off values of the GCEQ were determined to provide clinicians and physiotherapists with norm values for individuals' physical activity orientations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Exercise goal content reliability self-determination Turkish version validity

Kaynakça

  • Smith BE, Hendrick P, Bateman M, Holden S, Littlewood C, Smith TO, et al. Musculoskeletal pain and exercise—challenging existing paradigms and introducing new. British journal of sports medicine. 2019;53(14):907-12.
  • Dodge T, Joshi D, Alharbi M, Moore B. Effect of physical activity goals on aerobic physical activity: testing the mediating role of external and internal motivation. Psychology, Health & Medicine. 2022;27(6):1296-310.
  • Männikkö N, Billieux J, Kääriäinen M. Problematic digital gaming behavior and its relation to the psychological, social and physical health of Finnish adolescents and young adults. Journal of behavioral addictions. 2015;4(4):281-8.
  • Kosholap A, Maksymchuk B, Branitska T, Martynets L, Boichenko A, Stoliarenko O, et al. Neuropsychological bases of self-improvement of own physical health of future teachers in the course of university education. BRAIN. Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience. 2021;12(3):171-90.
  • Sebire SJ, Standage M, Vansteenkiste M. Development and validation of the goal content for exercise questionnaire. Journal of sport & exercise psychology. 2008;30(4).
  • Vasconcellos D, Parker PD, Hilland T, Cinelli R, Owen KB, Kapsal N, et al. Self-determination theory applied to physical education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of educational psychology. 2020;112(7):1444.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness. Rajagiri Management Journal. 2021;15(1):88-90.
  • Lindwall M, Weman-Josefsson K, Sebire SJ, Standage M. Viewing exercise goal content through a personoriented lens: A self-determination perspective. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2016;27:85-92.
  • Gut V, Conzelmann A, Schmid J. What do adolescents and young adults strive for in sport and exercise? An explorative study on goal profiles in sport and exercise. Journal of sports sciences. 2022;40(5):571-82.
  • Abrams B, Heggeseth B, Rehkopf D, Davis E. Parity and body mass index in US women: a prospective 25‐ year study. Obesity. 2013;21(8):1514-8.
  • Duncan MJ, Eyre EL, Bryant E, Seghers J, Galbraith N, Nevill AM. Autonomous motivation mediates the relation between goals for physical activity and physical activity behavior in adolescents. Journal of health psychology. 2017;22(5):595-604.
  • Sibley BA, Bergman SM. Relationships among goal contents, exercise motivations, physical activity, and aerobic fitness in university physical education courses. Perceptual and motor skills. 2016;122(2):678-700.
  • Izquierdo M, Merchant RA, Morley JE, Anker SD, Aprahamian I, Arai H, et al. International exercise recommendations in older adults (ICFSR): expert consensus guidelines. The journal of nutrition, health & aging. 2021;25(7):824-53.
  • Nicolosi S, Ruiz RO, Sillero JD. Achievement goal orientations and perceived physical competence profiles in adolescent physical activity. Psychology, Society & Education. 2021;13(1):27-47.
  • Trost SG, Sallis JF, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Taylor WC, Dowda M. Evaluating a model of parental influence on youth physical activity. American journal of preventive medicine. 2003;25(4):277-82.
  • Sicilia A, Alcaraz-Ibanez M, Lirola M-J, Burgueno R. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Goal Content for Exercise Questionnaire. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. 2017;49(3):182-93.
  • Antunes R, Couto N, Monteiro D, Moutão J, Marinho DA, Cid L. Validation of the Goal Content for Exercise Questionnaire (GCEQ) for a sample of elderly Portuguese people. Motricidade. 2017;13(1):59-67.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-91.
  • Özden F, Tuğay N, Tuğay BU, Kılınç CY. Psychometrical properties of the Turkish translation of the new knee society scoring system. Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica. 2019;53(3):184-8.
  • Koohpayehzadeh J, Hashemi A, Arabshahi KS, Bigdeli S, Moosavi M, Hatami K, et al. Assessing validity and reliability of Dundee ready educational environment measure (DREEM) in Iran. Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 2014;28:60.
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior research methods. 2009;41(4):1149-60.
  • Walter S, Eliasziw M, Donner A. Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in medicine. 1998;17(1):101-10.
  • Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Statistics in medicine. 2002;21(9):1331-5.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 2007;60(1):34- 42.
  • Baumgartner TA, Chung H. Confidence limits for intraclass reliability coefficients. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science. 2001;5(3):179-88.
  • Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice (Vol. 892, pp. 11-15). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
  • Juniper EF. How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. Quality of life and pharamacoeconomics in clinical trials. 1996:49-56.
  • Ruiz FJ, Odriozola-González P, Suárez-Falcón JC, Segura-Vargas MA. Psychometric properties of the Valuing Questionnaire in a Spaniard sample and factorial equivalence with a Colombian sample. PeerJ. 2022;10:e12670.
  • Chai S, Kueh YC, Yaacob NM, Kuan G. Psychometric properties of the malay version of the goal content for exercise questionnaire among undergraduate students at the health campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS. 2019;26(1):115.
  • Brebante ZR, Cagas JY. Body image, body mass index and the experience of Hiya in physical education among Filipino female university students. Asia Life Sciences. 2015;24(2):647-59.
  • Kumar R, Indrayan A. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers. Indian pediatrics. 2011;48(4):277-87.
  • Lindwall M, Martin Ginis KA. Moving towards a favorable image: The self‐presentational benefits of exercise and physical activity. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology. 2006;47(3):209-17.
  • Vilhjalmsson R, Thorlindsson T. Factors related to physical activity: a study of adolescents. Social science & medicine. 1998;47(5):665-75.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC medical research methodology. 2010;10(1):1-8.
  • Myers RS, Roth DL. Perceived benefits of and barriers to exercise and stage of exercise adoption in young adults. Health Psychology. 1997;16(3):277.
Toplam 35 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Araştırma Makaleleri
Yazarlar

Fatih Özden 0000-0001-6593-3758

Mehmet Özkeskin 0000-0002-6892-0108

Yayımlanma Tarihi 18 Eylül 2023
Gönderilme Tarihi 12 Ağustos 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023 Cilt: 62 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver Özden F, Özkeskin M. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Goal Content for Exercise Questionnaire. ETD. 2023;62(3):376-84.
 Kapak Resmi İndir

1724617243172472652917240      26515    

 26507    26508 26517265142651826513

2652026519