Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study

Zühal Demirci; Yasemin Yıldırım; Fisun Şenuzun Aykar; Fahri Şahin

doi:10.19161/etd.1658880

TR EN

Yetişkin hemofililerde profilaksi uyumunu etkileyen faktörler: Nitel bir çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Hemofili, kas ve eklemlerde spontan ve travmatik kanamalarla karakterize, genetik geçişli bir hastalıktır. Hemofili hastalarının yaşam kalitesini koruyabilmeleri için tedaviye iyi uyum sağlamaları ve hastalık yönetimini etkin bir şekilde gerçekleştirmeleri gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, hemofili hastalarında profilaktik tedaviye uyumu etkileyen faktörleri, hastaların bakış açısından değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya bir Hemofili Bakım Merkezi'nde takip edilen 21 birey katılmıştır. Katılımcıların çalışmaya dahil edilebilmesi için; bilgilendirilmiş onam vermeleri, 18 yaş ve üzerinde olmaları, hemofili A veya B tanısına sahip olmaları, en az iki yıldır profilaksi tedavisi alıyor olmaları ve Türkçe soruları anlayıp yanıtlayabilecek durumda olmaları gerekmekteydi. Veri toplama yöntemi olarak bireysel, yüz yüze derinlemesine görüşme tekniği kullanılmıştır. Görüşmeler ses kaydına alınmış ve kaydedilen veriler araştırmacı tarafından yazıya dökülmüştür. Veriler hem manuel olarak hem de nitel araştırma analizleri ve kavramsal haritalama için kullanılan NVivo yazılımı aracılığıyla analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmanın bulgularına göre, tedaviye uyumu azaltan faktörler arasında hastaneye ulaşmada yaşanan zorluklar, hastaların kendilerini iyi hissetmeleri ve sağlık çalışanlarının tutumları yer almaktadır. Öte yandan, tedaviye uyumu artıran faktörler ise günlük aktiviteleri sürdürebilmek, fiziksel fonksiyonları korumak ve kanama semptomlarıyla karşılaşmak olarak belirlenmiştir. Özellikle yetişkinlerde uyum çabalarına daha fazla önem verilmesi gerekmektedir. Ayrıca, sağlık çalışanları ile kurulan ilişkinin tedaviye uyum açısından kritik bir öneme sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, şu önemli noktaları anlamamıza katkı sağlamaktadır: I.Hemofili tedavi merkezleriyle etkili iletişim, hastalık ve tedaviye yönelik inançlar, sosyal destek ve hasta beklentileri, tedaviye uyumu artırmada önemli faktörlerdir. II.Tedaviye uyumun değerlendirilmesinde bireysel farklılıklar büyük önem taşımaktadır. Çalışmamız , EAHAD Kongresinde poster sunumu olarak kabul edilmiştir ve abstract olarak -Volume23, IssueS2, Special Issue:10th Annual Congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders, Paris, France February 2017 Pages e1-e8 (Late-Breaking Abstracts) ve “3.Hemofili Vakalarla Eğitim Sempozyumu, 17-19 Şubat 2017, Antalya da poster bildirisi olarak kabul edilmiş ve bildiri kitabında yayınlanmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study

Öz

Aim: Hemophilia is especially a hereditary disorder at risk of bleeding spontaneous and traumatic hemorrhages within the muscles and joints. Good adherence to treatment and disease management is essential for people with hemophilia to maintain a good quality of life. The aim of this study is to assess the factors influencing adherence to prophylactic treatment from the patients’ perspective. Materials and Methods: The study involved 21 participants who followed at a Hemophilia Care Centre. Participants were eligible for inclusion if they provided consent, were 18 years or older, had a diagnosis of hemophilia A or B, received prophylaxis for at least two years, and possessed the ability to understand and respond to the questions in Turkish. We used individual face-to-face in-depth interview to collect data. Interviews were taped recorded and data in the tape was transcribed by interviewer Data was analyzed both manually and with NVivo software for qualitative research analysis and concept mapping. Results: Results of this study, decreasing factors of adherence were difficulties accessing or getting to a hospital, feeling good, and health workers’ attitude. Increasing factors of adherence were preserving activities, physical function, experiencing bleeding symptoms. The adherence efforts should be especially to adults. Relationship with health worker is important for adherence treatment. Conclusions: This study allows us to understand (1). Effective communication with the hemophilia treatment center, beliefs about illness and treatment, social support, and patient expectations are crucial factors for improving adherence (2). Individual differences are vital in assessing treatment compliance. Note: Our study was accepted as a poster presentation at the EAHAD Congress and published as an abstract in - Volume 23, Issue 2, Special Issue: 10th Annual Congress of the European Association for Haemophilia and Allied Disorders, Paris, France, February 2017, Pages e1-e8 (Late-Breaking Abstracts) and also as a poster presentation at the 3rd Hemophilia Cases Education Symposium, February 17-19, 2017, Antalya, where it was published in the proceedings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Berntorp E, Fischer K, Hart DP, Mancuso ME, Stephensen D, Shapiro AD, et al. Haemophilia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):45.
Hermans C, Noone D, Benson G, Dolan G, Eichler H, Jiménez-Yuste V, et al. Hemophilia treatment in 2021: Choosing the"optimal" treatment using an integrative, patient-oriented approach to shared decision-making between patients and clinicians. Blood Rev. 2022;52:100890.
Malec L, Matino D. Targeting higher factor VIII levels for prophylaxis in haemophilia A: a narrative review. Haemophilia. 2023;29(6):1419-29.
Cotino C, Pérez-Alenda S, Cruz-Montecinos C, López-Bueno R, Núñez-Cortés R, Suso-Martí L, et al. Barriers and facilitators of physical activity in adults with severe haemophilia: A qualitative study. Haemophilia. 2023;29(5):1334-42.
Sun J, Zhou X, Hu N. Factor VIII replacement prophylaxis in patients with hemophilia A transitioning to adults: a systematic literature review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):287.
Guasch S, Scott LC, Figueroa J, Buckner TW, Mattis S, Tran DQ, Jr., et al. Cross-sectional study evaluating the association of haemophilia-related distress and clinically relevant outcomes. Haemophilia. 2023;29(2):505-12.
Mokhtar FM, Sathar J, Huri HZ. Medication Adherence for Haemophilia Patients: Outcome of Prophylaxis Treatment Intervention. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(12).
Cheung YT, Lam PH, Lam HHW, Ma CT, Leung AWK, Wong RSM, et al. Treatment Adherence and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Hemophilia in Hong Kong. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11).

Kihlberg K, Baghaei F, Bruzelius M, Funding E, Andre Holme P, Lassila R, et al. No difference in quality of life between persons with severe haemophilia A and B. Haemophilia. 2023;29(4):987-96.
Goudarzi F, Khadivzadeh T, Ebadi A, Babazadeh R. Women's interdependence after hysterectomy: a qualitative study based on Roy adaptation model. BMC Womens Health. 2022;22(1):40.
Zheng L, Jin Q. Roy adaptation model-based nursing diagnosis and implementation reduces the sense of shame and enhances nursing outcomes in female patients with breast cancer. Am J Transl Res. 2022;14(8):5520-8.
Rezazadeh M, Hosseini SA, Musarezaie A. Effects of Roy's Adaptation Model on Quality of Life in People with Opioid Abuse under Methadone Maintenance Treatment: A Randomized Trial. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2023;33(2):355-62.
Hennink M, Kaiser BN. Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Soc Sci Med. 2022;292:114523.
van Balen EC, Wesselo ML, Baker BL, Westerman MJ, Coppens M, Smit C, et al. Patient Perspectives on Novel Treatments in Haemophilia: A Qualitative Study. Patient. 2020;13(2):201-10.
Witkop ML, McLaughlin JM, Anderson TL, Munn JE, Lambing A, Tortella B. Predictors of non-adherence to prescribed prophylactic clotting-factor treatment regimens among adolescent and young adults with a bleeding disorder. Haemophilia. 2016;22(4):e245-50.
Zdziarska J, Górska-Kosicka M, Jamrozik M, Kozińska J, Podolak-Dawidziak M, Stefańska-Windyga E, et al. Adherence to prophylactic treatment in adult patients with severe hemophilia in Poland. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022;132(7-8).
Remor E. Predictors of treatment difficulties and satisfaction with haemophilia therapy in adult patients. Haemophilia. 2011;17(5):e901-5.
Petrini P. Identifying and overcoming barriers to prophylaxis in the management of haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2007;13 Suppl 2:16-22.
Saxena K. Barriers and perceived limitations to early treatment of hemophilia. J Blood Med. 2013;4:49-56.
Mokhtar FM, Rajakumar S, Zaman Huri H. Adherence tool for prophylactic haemophilia treatment in adult and adolescent patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. PLoS One. 2023;18(12):e0289815.
Okaygoun D, Oliveira DD, Soman S, Williams R. Advances in the management of haemophilia: emerging treatments and their mechanisms. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28(1):64.
Carcao M. Changing paradigm of prophylaxis with longer acting factor concentrates. Haemophilia. 2014;20 Suppl 4:99-105.
Gogia P, Tarantino M, Schramm W, Aledort L. New directions to develop therapies for people with hemophilia. Expert Rev Hematol. 2023;16(6):417-33.
Ucero-Lozano R, Pérez-Llanes R, Cuesta-Barriuso R, Donoso-Úbeda E. Changes in Quality of Life, Adherence, and Kinesiophobia in Patients with Hemophilia Treated with Extended Half-Life Treatment: Final Results of the LongHest Project. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024;17(7).
Måseide RJ, Berntorp E, Astermark J, Olsson A, Bruzelius M, Frisk T, et al. Health-related quality of life and physical activity in Nordic patients with moderate haemophilia A and B (the MoHem study). Haemophilia. 2024;30(1):98-105.
Beeton K, Neal D, Lee C. An exploration of health-related quality of life in adults with haemophilia--a qualitative perspective. Haemophilia. 2005;11(2):123-32.
Khair K. Minimizing joint damage: the role of nurses in promoting adherence to hemophilia treatment. Orthop Nurs. 2010;29(3):193-200; quiz 1-2.
Hoefnagels JW, Kars MC, Fischer K, Schutgens R, Schrijvers LH. The Perspectives of Adolescents and Young Adults on Adherence to Prophylaxis in Hemophilia: A Qualitative Study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;14:163-71.
Gue D, Squire S, McIntosh K, Bartholomew C, Summers N, Sun H, et al. Joining the patient on the path to customized prophylaxis: one hemophilia team explores the tools of engagement. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015;8:527-34.
Schrijvers LH, Kars MC, Beijlevelt-van der Zande M, Peters M, Schuurmans MJ, Fischer K. Unravelling adherence to prophylaxis in haemophilia: a patients' perspective. Haemophilia. 2015;21(5):612-21.
Miesbach W, von Drygalski A, Smith C, Sivamurthy K, Pinachyan K, Bensen-Kennedy D, et al. The current challenges faced by people with hemophilia B. Eur J Haematol. 2024;112(3):339-49.
Pérez-Robles T, Romero-Garrido JA, Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Herrero-Ambrosio A. Objective quantification of adherence to prophylaxis in haemophilia patients aged 12 to 25years and its potential association with bleeding episodes. Thromb Res. 2016;143:22-7.
Siddiqi AE, Ebrahim SH, Soucie JM, Parker CS, Atrash HK. Burden of disease resulting from hemophilia in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(4 Suppl):S482-8.
Königs C, Motwani J, Jiménez-Yuste V, Blatný J. Teenagers and Adolescents with Hemophilia-Need for a Specific Approach. J Clin Med. 2024;13(17).
Butler RB, Cheadle A, Aschman DJ, Riske B, Senter S, McLaughlin KM, et al. National needs assessment of patients treated at the United States Federally-Funded Hemophilia Treatment Centers. Haemophilia. 2016;22(1):e11-7.
Lamiani G, Strada I, Mancuso ME, Coppola A, Vegni E, Moja EA. Factors influencing illness representations and perceived adherence in haemophilic patients: a pilot study. Haemophilia. 2015;21(5):598-604.
Eek D, Krohe M, Mazar I, Horsfield A, Pompilus F, Friebe R, et al. Patient-reported preferences for oral versus intravenous administration for the treatment of cancer: a review of the literature. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1609-21.
Clearfield E, Chang HY, Janssen EM, Majid T, Messner DA, Coffin D, et al. Development of the coreHEM mental health patient-reported outcome measure - A novel mental health outlook measure for people with haemophilia. Haemophilia. 2024;30(6):1309-20.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Hematoloji, İç Hastalıkları

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Zühal Demirci ^*
0000-0001-7509-8020
Türkiye

Yasemin Yıldırım
0000-0002-8970-3743
Türkiye

Fisun Şenuzun Aykar
0000-0002-3466-4943
Türkiye

Fahri Şahin
0000-0001-9315-8891
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

10 Haziran 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Mart 2025

Kabul Tarihi

16 Aralık 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 65 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1658880

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA27FK75JP

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Demirci, Z., Yıldırım, Y., Şenuzun Aykar, F., & Şahin, F. (2026). Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study. Ege Tıp Dergisi, 65(2), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1658880

AMA

1.Demirci Z, Yıldırım Y, Şenuzun Aykar F, Şahin F. Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study. ETD. 2026;65(2):227-236. doi:10.19161/etd.1658880

Chicago

Demirci, Zühal, Yasemin Yıldırım, Fisun Şenuzun Aykar, ve Fahri Şahin. 2026. “Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study”. Ege Tıp Dergisi 65 (2): 227-36. https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1658880.

EndNote

Demirci Z, Yıldırım Y, Şenuzun Aykar F, Şahin F (01 Haziran 2026) Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study. Ege Tıp Dergisi 65 2 227–236.

IEEE

[1]Z. Demirci, Y. Yıldırım, F. Şenuzun Aykar, ve F. Şahin, “Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study”, ETD, c. 65, sy 2, ss. 227–236, Haz. 2026, doi: 10.19161/etd.1658880.

ISNAD

Demirci, Zühal - Yıldırım, Yasemin - Şenuzun Aykar, Fisun - Şahin, Fahri. “Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study”. Ege Tıp Dergisi 65/2 (01 Haziran 2026): 227-236. https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.1658880.

JAMA

1.Demirci Z, Yıldırım Y, Şenuzun Aykar F, Şahin F. Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study. ETD. 2026;65:227–236.

MLA

Demirci, Zühal, vd. “Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study”. Ege Tıp Dergisi, c. 65, sy 2, Haziran 2026, ss. 227-36, doi:10.19161/etd.1658880.

Vancouver

1.Zühal Demirci, Yasemin Yıldırım, Fisun Şenuzun Aykar, Fahri Şahin. Influencing factors of adherence to prophylaxis in adults with hemophilia: A qualitative study. ETD. 01 Haziran 2026;65(2):227-36. doi:10.19161/etd.1658880