Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of pain score and patient satisfaction between laparoscopic and open abdominal incisional hernia repair

Cilt: 57 Sayı: 4 3 Aralık 2018
  • İlker Murat Arer *
  • Murat Kuş
  • Nezih Akkapulu
  • Hakan Yabanoğlu
  • Hüseyin Özgür Aytac
  • Nurkan Törer
PDF İndir
TR EN

Comparison of pain score and patient satisfaction between laparoscopic and open abdominal incisional hernia repair

Abstract

Aim: Incisional hernia is one of the most common postoperative complications of abdominal surgery. Recently laparoscopic repair was introduced. The aim of this study is to compare pain scores and satisfaction rates of patients performed open and laparoscopic incisional hernia repair.

Materials and Methods: A total of 164 patients were included. Group 1 (n=47) consists of patients performed laparoscopic repair and Group 2 (n=117) consists of open repair. Patients were analyzed according to demographic data, operative findings, postoperative complications and recurrence. 32 (68.08%) patients in Group 1 and 88 (75.21%) patients in Group 2 were applied to telephone survey. Pain scores and satisfaction rates of patients were compared.

Results: 51 (31.1%) patients were male and 113 (68.9%) patients were female. Mean age of patients was 55.35±11.73 years. Postoperative complications were found in only 2.1% of patients in Group 1 and 23.9% of patients in Group 2 (p<0.05). Recurrence rates for Group 1 and 2 was 25.7% and 20%, respectively (p>0.05). No statistical difference was observed between groups regarding to pain scores and satisfaction rates (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Although laparoscopic repair seems to have advantages, it has no superiority to the open repair regarding pain and satisfaction.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Mudge M, Hughes LE. Incisional hernia: a 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes. Br J Surg 1985;72(1):70-1.
  2. Hoer J, Lawong G, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Factors influencing the development of incisional hernia. A retrospective study of 2,983 laparotomy patients over a period of 10 years. Chirurg 2002;73(5):474-80.
  3. Bevis PM, Windhaber RA, Lear PA, Poskitt KR, Earnshaw JJ, Mitchell DC. Randomized clinical trial of mesh versus sutured wound closure after open abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery. Br J Surg 2010;97(10):1497-502.
  4. Pham CT, Perera CL, Watkin DS, Maddern GJ. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: A systematic review. Surg Endosc 2009;23(1):4-15.
  5. Bucknall TE, Cox PJ, Ellis H. Burst abdomen and incisional hernia: A prospective study of 1129 major laparotomies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1982;284(6320):931-3.
  6. Cassar K, Munro A. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br J Surg 2002;89(5):534-45.
  7. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Available from: http://www.ssat.com/cgi-bin/incisionalhernia.cgi (accessed 20.04.2014).
  8. Chevrel JP. The treatment of large midline incisional hernias by "overcoat" plasty and prothesis (author's transl). Nouv Presse Med 1979;8(9):695-96.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Murat Kuş
0000-0001-6529-7579
Türkiye

Nezih Akkapulu
0000-0001-7392-961X
Türkiye

Hakan Yabanoğlu
0000-0002-1161-3369
Türkiye

Hüseyin Özgür Aytac
0000-0002-3583-9282
Türkiye

Nurkan Törer
0000-0002-2749-3787
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

3 Aralık 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

7 Ağustos 2017

Kabul Tarihi

2 Kasım 2017

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 57 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver
1.İlker Murat Arer, Murat Kuş, Nezih Akkapulu, Hakan Yabanoğlu, Hüseyin Özgür Aytac, Nurkan Törer. Comparison of pain score and patient satisfaction between laparoscopic and open abdominal incisional hernia repair. ETD. 01 Aralık 2018;57(4):195-200. doi:10.19161/etd.417270

Cited By

Ege Tıp Dergisi, makalelerin Atıf-Gayri Ticari-Aynı Lisansla Paylaş 4.0 Uluslararası (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) lisansına uygun bir şekilde paylaşılmasına izin verir.