Year 2019, Volume 58 , Issue 4, Pages 363 - 369 2019-12-30

Servikokranial damarlar için dijital subtraksiyon anjiografi ve multislice bilgisayarlı tomografi anjiografi radyasyon dozlarının karşılaştırılması
Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses

H. İbrahim ÖZDEMİR [1] , Celal ÇINAR [2] , Halil BOZKAYA [3] , Selçuk TOPAL [4] , İsmail ORAN [5]


Amaç: Bu çalışmada amacımız tanı ve radyasyon dozlarının üstünlüğü açısından dijital subtraksiyon anjiyografi (DSA) ve bilgisayarlı tomografi anjiyografi (CTA) tekniklerini karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2014 yılı Ocak-Aralık tarihleri arasında hem DSA hem de CTA ile boyun-beyin anjiyografik muayeneye tabi tutulan 46 hasta (21 erkek, 25 kadın) retrospektif olarak tarandı. DSA ve CT cihazları tarafından sağlanan kartlardan alınan radyasyon dozu kayıtları gözden geçirildi. Toplam DSA (DSA + 3D-DSA), DSA, 3D-DSA ve CTA dozu raporları ayrı ayrı incelendi. Oluşturulan üç boyutlu görüntüler en az beş yıl nöroloji ve girişimsel radyolojide tecrübesi olan iki radyolog tarafından değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel hesaplamalarda Independent samples testi, ikili karşılaştırmalarda ise paired samples testi kullanıldı. Bulgular: DSA ve CTA radyasyon dozları arasında yapılan karşılaştırmada, toplam TDSA dozunun [DSA + 3 boyutlu (3D) DSA], CTA dozundan 3 kat fazla olduğu ve DSA dozunun, CTA dozundan 2 kat daha fazla olduğu bulundu. 3D DSA ve CTA dozları arasında istatistiksel bir fark yoktu. CTA, DSA'dan daha az duyarlı idi; 68 intrakranial anevrizmanın dördü CTA ile kanıtlanamadı. Hastalar tarafından alınan radyasyon dozları cinsiyetle değişmedi. Sonuç: CTA intrakranial anevrizma tanısında daha az radyasyon dozu içerir, ancak duyarlılığı DSA'dan daha düşüktür.
Aim: In this study our purpose was to compare the digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) techniques in terms of the superiority of diagnosis and radiation doses. Materials and Methods: Forty-six patients (21 men, 25 women) who were subjected to both digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and computed tomography (CT) neck-brain angiographic examinations between January and December 2014 were screened retrospectively. Radiation dose records taken from the cards provided by DSA and CT devices were reviewed. The total DSA [DSA+ tri-dimension (3D) DSA], DSA, 3D-DSA and CTA dose reports were examined separately. Generated 3D images were evaluated by two radiologists who had experience in neuro radiology and interventional radiology at least for five years. Independent samples test and in dual comparisons the paired samples test, were used for statistical analyses. Results: Comparison made between DSA and CTA radiation doses has found that the total dose of total DSA (DSA+3D DSA) was three times and the DSA doses were two times higher than the CTA dose. There was no statistical difference between 3D DSA and CTA doses. CTA is less sensitive than DSA; four of 68 intracranial aneurisms could not be demonstrated with CTA. The radiation doses received by patients did not change with gender. Conclusion: CTA contains less radiation doses in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurisms, but its sensitivity, however, is lower than DSA.
  • Brisman JL, Song JK, Newell DW. Cerebral aneurism. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(9):928-39. 2. Schievink WI. Intracranial aneurisms. N Engl J Med. 1997; 336 (1): 28-40.
  • Kim S, Sopko D, Toncheva G, Enterline D, Keijzers B, Yoshizumi TT. Radiation dose from 3D rotational X-ray imaging: organ and effective dose with conversion factors. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012; 150 (1): 50-4. 4. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37 (2-4): 1-332.
  • Jessen KA, Shrimpton PC, Geleijns J, Panzer W, Tosi G. Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography. Appl Radiat Isot. 1999; 50 (1):165-72.
  • Christner JA, Kofler JM, McCollough CH. Estimating effective dose for CT using dose-length product compared with using organ doses: consequences of adopting International Commission on Radiological Protection publication 103 or dual-energy scanning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194 (4): 881-9. Cilt 58 Sayı 4, Aralık 2019 / Volume 58 Issue 4, December 2019 369
  • Kyriakou Y, Richter G, Dörfler A, Kalender WA. Neuroradiologic Applications with Routine C-arm Flat Panel Detector CT: Evaluation of Patient Dose Measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29 (10): 1930-6
  • Huda W, Mettler FA. Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? Radiology. 2011; 258 (1): 236-42.
  • Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Niu JB, Zhang ZL, Wang HZ, Zhao YE, et al. Dual-Energy CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurisms: Image Quality, Radiation Dose, and Comparison With 3D Rotational Digital Subtraction Angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194 (1): 23-30.
  • Koyama S, Aoyama T, Oda N, Yamauchi-Kawaura C. Radiation dose evaluation in tomosynthesis and C-arm cone-beam CT examination with an anthropomorphic phantom. Med Phys. 2010; 37 (8): 4298-306.
  • Sanchez RM, Vano E, Fernández JM, Moreu M, Lopez-Ibor L. Brain Radiation Doses to Patients in an Interventional Neuroradiology Laboratory. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014; 35 (7): 1276-80.
  • Bai M, Liu X, Liu B. Effective patient dose during neuroradiological C-arm CT procedures. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013; 19 (1): 29-32. 13. ICRP Publication 105. Radiation protection in medicine. Ann ICRP. 2007; 37 (6): 1-63.
  • McCollough CH, Christner JA, Kofler JM. How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194 (4): 890-6.
  • Jessen, KA, Shrimpton, PC, J. Geleijns, J, Panzer, W, Tosi, G. Dosimetry for optimisation of patient protection in computed tomography. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 1999; 50 (1): 165-72.
  • Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Persijn van Meerten E, Rodríguez R, Schneider K, Calzado A, Geleijns J, Jessen KA, Panzer W, Shrimpton PC, Tosi G. European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography. Funded by the European Commission. Contract number FIGM-CT2000-20078-CT-TIP. March 2004.
  • Shrimpton P. Assessment of patient dose in CT. In: EUR. European guidelines for multislice computed tomography funded by the European Commission 2004: contract number FIGMCT2000-20078-CT-TIP. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: European Commission, 2004:Appendix C.
  • Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. Doses from computed tomography (CT) examinations in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol. 2006; 79 (948): 968-80.
  • EC 2008. Radiatıon Protection No:154. European Guidance on Estimating Population Doses from Medical X-Ray Procedures. Luxembourg, 2008.
  • AAPM Report No:96. Report of AAPM Task Group 23 of the Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. USA, 2008.
  • Dammert S, Krings T, Moller-Hartmann W, Ueffing E, Hans FJ, Wilmes K, et al. Detection of intracranial aneurisms with multislice CT: comparison with conventional angiography. Neuroradiology. 2004; 46 (6): 427-34.
  • Kouskouras C, Charitanti A, Giavroglou C, Foroglou N, Selviaridis P, Kontopoulos V, Dimitriadis AS. Intracranial aneurisms: evaluation using CTA and MRA: correlation with DSA and intraoperative findings. Neuroradiology. 2004; 46 (10): 842-50.
  • Chappell ET, Moure FC, Good MC. Comparison of computed tomographic angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurisms: a meta-analysis. Neurosurgery. 2003;52(3):624-31.
  • White PM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V. Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurisms? A systematic review. Radiology. 2000; 217 (2): 361-70.
  • White PM, Teasdale EM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V. Intracranial aneurisms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort. Radiology. 2001; 219 (3): 739-49.
  • Okahara M, Kiyosue H, Yamashita M, Naqatomi H, Hata H, Saginova T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for cerebral aneurisms in correlation with 3D-digital subtraction angiographic images: a study of 133 aneurisms. Stroke. 2002; 33 (7): 1803-8.
  • Harrison MJ, Johnson BA, Gardner GM, Welling BG. Preliminary results on the management of unruptured intracranial aneurisms with magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography. Neurosurgery. 1997; 40 (5): 947-55.
  • Bederson JB, Awad IA, Wiebers DO, Piepqras D, Haley EC Jr, Brot T, et al. Recommendations for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurisms: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association. Stroke. 2000; 31 (11): 2742-50.
  • Tipper G, U-King-Im JM, Price SJ, Trivedi RA, Cross JJ, Higgins NJ, et al. Detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurisms with 16-row multislice CT angiography. Clin Radiol. 2005; 60 (5): 565-72.
  • Manninen AL, Isokangas JM, Karttunen K, Siniluoto T, Nieminen MT. A Comparison of Radiation Exposure between Diagnostic CTA and DSA Examinations of Cerebral and Cervicocerebral Vessels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33 (11): 2038-42.
Primary Language en
Subjects Health Care Sciences and Services
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Orcid: 0000-0002-3336-6848
Author: H. İbrahim ÖZDEMİR (Primary Author)
Institution: Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Bornova / Izmir
Country: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-3237-9268
Author: Celal ÇINAR
Institution: Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Bornova / Izmir
Country: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-5012-6635
Author: Halil BOZKAYA
Institution: Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Bornova / Izmir
Country: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0001-7074-2569
Author: Selçuk TOPAL
Institution: Bitlis Eren University, Faculty of Science and Literature, Department of Mathematics, Bitlis
Country: Turkey


Orcid: 0000-0002-3546-7773
Author: İsmail ORAN
Institution: Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Bornova / Izmir
Country: Andorra


Dates

Application Date : July 10, 2018
Acceptance Date : October 12, 2018
Publication Date : December 30, 2019

Bibtex @research article { etd662373, journal = {Ege Tıp Dergisi}, issn = {1016-9113}, eissn = {2147-6500}, address = {}, publisher = {Ege University}, year = {2019}, volume = {58}, pages = {363 - 369}, doi = {10.19161/etd.662373}, title = {Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses}, key = {cite}, author = {Özdemir, H. İbrahim and Çınar, Celal and Bozkaya, Halil and Topal, Selçuk and Oran, İsmail} }
APA Özdemir, H , Çınar, C , Bozkaya, H , Topal, S , Oran, İ . (2019). Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses . Ege Tıp Dergisi , 58 (4) , 363-369 . DOI: 10.19161/etd.662373
MLA Özdemir, H , Çınar, C , Bozkaya, H , Topal, S , Oran, İ . "Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses" . Ege Tıp Dergisi 58 (2019 ): 363-369 <http://egetipdergisi.com.tr/en/pub/issue/50673/662373>
Chicago Özdemir, H , Çınar, C , Bozkaya, H , Topal, S , Oran, İ . "Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses". Ege Tıp Dergisi 58 (2019 ): 363-369
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses AU - H. İbrahim Özdemir , Celal Çınar , Halil Bozkaya , Selçuk Topal , İsmail Oran Y1 - 2019 PY - 2019 N1 - doi: 10.19161/etd.662373 DO - 10.19161/etd.662373 T2 - Ege Tıp Dergisi JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 363 EP - 369 VL - 58 IS - 4 SN - 1016-9113-2147-6500 M3 - doi: 10.19161/etd.662373 UR - https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.662373 Y2 - 2018 ER -
EndNote %0 Ege Tıp Dergisi Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses %A H. İbrahim Özdemir , Celal Çınar , Halil Bozkaya , Selçuk Topal , İsmail Oran %T Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses %D 2019 %J Ege Tıp Dergisi %P 1016-9113-2147-6500 %V 58 %N 4 %R doi: 10.19161/etd.662373 %U 10.19161/etd.662373
ISNAD Özdemir, H. İbrahim , Çınar, Celal , Bozkaya, Halil , Topal, Selçuk , Oran, İsmail . "Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses". Ege Tıp Dergisi 58 / 4 (December 2019): 363-369 . https://doi.org/10.19161/etd.662373
AMA Özdemir H , Çınar C , Bozkaya H , Topal S , Oran İ . Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses. ETD. 2019; 58(4): 363-369.
Vancouver Özdemir H , Çınar C , Bozkaya H , Topal S , Oran İ . Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses. Ege Tıp Dergisi. 2019; 58(4): 363-369.
IEEE H. Özdemir , C. Çınar , H. Bozkaya , S. Topal and İ. Oran , "Digital subtraction angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography for cervicocranial vessels: comparison of radiation doses", Ege Tıp Dergisi, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 363-369, Dec. 2020, doi:10.19161/etd.662373