Araştırma Makalesi

Denetimli serbestlik tedbiri bulunan metamfetamin kullanıcılarının saldırganlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi

Cilt: 64 Sayı: 2 10 Haziran 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Investigation of aggression levels of methamphetamine users in probation

Abstract

Aim: The use of methamphetamine is a global health concern that profoundly impacts individual well-being, potentially resulting in severe health consequences and mortality. Probation, a prevalent legal substitute for imprisonment, is essential in the oversight and rehabilitation of methamphetamine-related probationers. This study aimed to identify the characteristics of methamphetamine users and assess their aggression levels. Materials and Methods: The sample for this descriptive cross-sectional study comprises 200 adult probationers (27 females, 173 males). The study utilized personal and criminological information forms, the Addiction Profile Index (API), and the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire (BPAQ). Results: The mean age of the probationers was 32.32 ± 8.41 years (Female: 30.07 ± 7.14; Male: 32.67 ± 8.55). It was determined that 52.5% were unmarried, 36.5% had experienced traumatic events (including earthquakes, violence, or death), 39% had a history of incarceration, 18% had attempted suicide, and 39% exhibited self-injurious behaviors. Upon analyzing the addiction profiles of probationers, it was shown that 40% had engaged in drug use for a duration of 1 to 5 years, while 64.5% exhibited polydrug usage. The average overall aggressiveness score of probationers was 76.36±20.47, whereas the average total API score was 9.08±3.99. The correlation study indicated a somewhat positive and statistically significant association between probationers' levels of hostility and addiction (p<0.05). Conclusion: Acknowledging the traits of methamphetamine users and their aggression levels during probation may enhance the efficacy of probation practices and aid in diminishing drug consumption.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Uzbay İT. Substance addiction: Addiction and addictive substances in all its dimensions. Istanbul: Istanbul Medical Bookstore; 2015.
  2. Mayes LC. Reframing caring for parents who struggle with substance-use disorders. Infant Ment Health J. 2023;44(2):284-289. doi: 10.1002/imhj.22052.
  3. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). European drug report 2017: trends and developments. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017.
  4. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). World Drug Report 2012. Vienna: United Nations; 2013.
  5. Kittirattanapaiboon P, Mahatnirunkul S, Booncharoen H, Thummawong P, Dumrongchai U, Chutha W. Long-term outcomes in methamphetamine psychosis after first hospitalization. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2010;29:456-461.
  6. Grant KM, LeVan TD, Wells SM, Li M, Stoltenberg SF, Gendelman HE, Bevins RA. Methamphetamine-associated psychosis. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2011;7(1):113-139. doi: 10.1007/s11481-011-9288-1.
  7. Wodahl EJ, Ogle R, Kadleck C, Gerow KG. Offender perceptions of graduated sanctions. Crime Delinquency. 2009;59(8):1185-1210. doi: 10.1177/0011128709333725.
  8. Öner MZ. The offences of manufacturing, importing and exporting narcotic substances in the Turkish Penal Code. J TBB. 2010;88:106-150.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Madde Bağımlılığı

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

10 Haziran 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

21 Ekim 2024

Kabul Tarihi

24 Ocak 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1970 Cilt: 64 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

Vancouver
1.Fatma Dilek Şeker, Dilek Öker Keleş. Investigation of aggression levels of methamphetamine users in probation. ETD. 01 Haziran 2025;64(2):209-22. doi:10.19161/etd.1571054

Ege Tıp Dergisi, makalelerin Atıf-Gayri Ticari-Aynı Lisansla Paylaş 4.0 Uluslararası (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) lisansına uygun bir şekilde paylaşılmasına izin verir.