Araştırma Makalesi

A radio-paleontological evaluation and comparison of Anatolian rhinoplasty patients and the literature. Who are we “engaged” to operate?

Cilt: 59 Sayı: 2 30 Haziran 2020
  • Mehmet Emre Yeğin *
Ege Tıp Dergisi Kapak
Ege Tıp Dergisi
PDF İndir
TR EN

A radio-paleontological evaluation and comparison of Anatolian rhinoplasty patients and the literature. Who are we “engaged” to operate?

Abstract

Aim: Nasal bone anatomy is a frequent target of rhinoplasty procedures. This study aims to examine the nasal bony anatomy of rhinoplasty-seeking patients, and compare it with the recent literature. Materials and Methods: 138 patients seeking rhinoplasty were examined with CT scans. Nasal bone length, width, osteotomy line bone thicknesses on three separate levels, aperture width and lengths were measured. 87 female and 51 male patients, aged between 16 to 58 years, were included in this study. Results: Nasal bone lengths were measured as 2.47±0.42 cm, widths were measured as 1.06±0.19 cm on right and 1.06±0.21 cm on left, aperture widths were measured as 2.31±0.2 cm and heights as 3.16±0.43 cm, osteotomy thicknesses were measured as 1.61±0.33 mm, 1.79±0.37 mm, 2.05±0.45 mm on inferior, medial and superior parts, respectively. Conclusion: Measurements of nasal skeletal properties showed unsimilar results with studies from adjacent areas. Therefore, it may be wise to say that surgeons should not approach every patient as a standard patient with similar anatomical structures.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Gruber RP, Garza RM, Cho GJ. Nasal Bone Osteotomies with Nonpowered Tools. Clin Plast Surg. 2016; 43 (1): 73-83.
  2. Lee SH, Yang TY, Han GS, Kim YH, Jang TY. Analysis of the nasal bone and nasal pyramid by three-dimensional computed tomography. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2008; 265 (4): 421-4.
  3. Lang J, Baumeister R. [Postnatal growth of the nasal cavity]. Gegenbaurs Morphol Jahrb. 1982; 128 (3): 354-93.
  4. Ofodile FA. Nasal bones and pyriform apertures in blacks. Ann Plast Surg. 1994; 32 (1): 21-6.
  5. Hwang TS, Song J, Yoon H, Cho BP, Kang HS. Morphometry of the nasal bones and piriform apertures in Koreans. Ann Anat. 2005; 187 (4): 411-4.
  6. Alharethy S, Aldaghri F, Mesallam TA, Farahat M, Bukhari MA. Nasal bone length in Saudi rhinoplasty: A clinical-radiological study. Ann Saudi Med. 2014; 34 (1): 65-7.
  7. Zamani Naser A, Panahi Boroujeni M. CBCT Evaluation of Bony Nasal Pyramid Dimensions in Iranian Population: A Comparative Study with Ethnic Groups. Int Sch Res Not. 2014; 2014: 1-5.
  8. Kaplanoglu H, Coskun H, Toprak U. Computed Tomography Evaluation of Nasal Bone and Nasal Pyramid in the Turkish Population. J Craniofac Surg. 2017; 28 (4): 1063-7.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Mehmet Emre Yeğin *
0000-0001-5788-0705
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Haziran 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Temmuz 2019

Kabul Tarihi

10 Kasım 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 59 Sayı: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA38JR35UC

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Emre Yeğin. A radio-paleontological evaluation and comparison of Anatolian rhinoplasty patients and the literature. Who are we “engaged” to operate? ETD [Internet]. 01 Haziran 2020;59(2):97-100. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA38JR35UC

Ege Tıp Dergisi, makalelerin Atıf-Gayri Ticari-Aynı Lisansla Paylaş 4.0 Uluslararası (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) lisansına uygun bir şekilde paylaşılmasına izin verir.